They will conduct research and use reasoning to record the absolute and/or relative date for each artifact and list their evidence.
Archaeologists use many different techniques to determine the age of a particular artifact, site, or part of a site.
The basis for stratigraphy seems quite intuitive today, but its applications were no less than earth-shattering to archaeological theory.
It makes no sense at all if man appeared at the end of billions of years.
But how do archaeologists know which layers are old and which are new? (the study of the Earth) teaches archaeologists that: a) soil layers on top are usually younger than layers on the bottom; b) certain soil types are found in certain environments only. For the things and artifacts in the layers, if they aren't diagnostic, archaeologists research a date for them by: -looking up in old catalogues to find when they were made, or popular; -doing chemical or other scientific tests on the artifacts or the things in the same layer as the artifacts; -knowing which layer it came from - whether it is older or younger than the things above or below it. "Present" changes every fifty years, so archaeologists adjust their dates each fifty years. Should archaeologists withhold their findings at any time because they offend some people?
This helps an archaeologist know which order layers should be found in and what they should look like. Dating something by knowing what is older or younger than it is, is called to give absolute dates. This seems a lot, by over tens of thousands of years, it isn't. Name three ways an archaeologist uses to date an artifact.
Familiar to us as the black substance in charred wood, as diamonds, and the graphite in “lead” pencils, carbon comes in several forms, or isotopes.
One rare form has atoms that are 14 times as heavy as hydrogen atoms: carbon-14, or C ratio gets smaller.