Sugar Daddie was the first sugar daddy dating site on the web that promoted "where the classy, attractive and affluent meet".
What makes it our number 4 site is its huge traffic and user base.
With over 615,000 members worldwide and over half a million trips booked, there is no denying that it is filling a need.
It was initially launched as a dating site over two years ago, the first in the "travel dating space," according to founder Brandon Wade, the relationship guru behind the sugar daddy search sites The website boasts an astonishing clientele of over 4.5 million sugar babies, sugar daddies and sugar mommas, and is active in 139 countries. They provide "no strings" (if you buy that I've got a Florida sinkhole I'd love to sell you) attached matches, thereby redefining the expectations of a perfect relationship.
Sugar daddy sites are great social network for attractive women to meet rich men and date up. But considering that it only serves male daddies and female babies from developed countries, it does have an active user base in United States and Australia.
While the lifestyle becomes more and more popular, more dating sites and apps have been launched to cater to the needs of sugar daters. By posting your profile and photos on Sugar Daddy Meet, you start getting views, winks, and messages from sugar daters in your area, and it's free for you to wink back or message back. And it's convenient to use on mobile site and apps for i Phone and Android. They promote the usual sugar daddy stuff: young, beautiful, ambitious women willing to please; affluent, caring, generous mentors, who want to pamper and spoil someone special.
If I had a hefty allowance from a generous benefactor, though, I figured that I could take the leap comfortably. To overcome my reservations about walking the line between dating and prostitution, I told myself that any such concerns were the result of societal conditioning.
The idea of wealthy older people supporting struggling younger ones is nothing revolutionary, after all—look what Peggy Guggenheim did for Jackson Pollock or the Tuohys did for N. The idea that mixing money and mating is inherently bad, I reasoned, was a fallacy based on our collective obsession with moralizing sex.
Her adventures in “sugaring” started three years ago when she got hit on by an older guy and rebuffed him, saying, “Look, I’m not interested, so unless you’re offering to pay my student loans,” and he said, “Well . “ ‘Well, I could always just get a sugar daddy,’ ‘I guess I could just start camming,’ ” or doing sexual performances in front of a Webcam for money on sites like Chaturbate.
We were at Megu, a pricey Japanese restaurant in Midtown Manhattan, eating perfectly cooked Kobe beef.
My companion, a wealthy finance type, was telling me all about himself and posing questions that suggested he was interested in me.
They even provide a mobile friendly app so that you can find an "arrangement" anywhere, anytime and on any device (how convenient), and they refer to their matches as ideal relationships because they are honest, upfront and with someone who will cater to your needs (good luck with that). But disguising sex for money with a slick and enticing website is still pay for play.
Have men lost all hope of finding a suitable mate the old fashion way? These websites do not encourage independence in women. What they offer is an opportunity to exchange what they have for cash, gifts, pampering, and travel.